Match Focus: Arsenal Architects of Own Downfall Despite Troubling Barcelona
For a final result as clear-cut and seemingly conclusive as at the Emirates on Tuesday night, there was still one question: was Barcelona’s 2-0 win primarily down to their brilliance, or Arsenal’s naivety and own errors.
It is probably a mix of both but Arsene Wenger evidently didn’t feel that way. He had no doubt about the answer and, in his clear frustration, revealed a real sense of regret at a wasted opportunity. He blamed his team.
“I think they are the best team in Europe but I felt there was room to beat them tonight. That’s my biggest regret tonight… I think we could have won the game tonight if we had kept the discipline until the end.” Then came the flurry, and Wenger’s own crescendo of precision to match Leo Messi’s.
“Once again,” the Arsenal manager sighed in exasperation, “like against Monaco. Exactly the same. We were caught in exactly the same way.” On the break. Except, it wasn’t quite exactly the same. Monaco’s attack in that 3-1 win didn’t quite produce a move as glorious as Barca’s opening goal in this game.
It is also rather ironic. By the time that Messi had hit the net - and that after the dismissive side-step of Petr Cech that made a mockery of suggestions the goalkeeper might have some kind of psychological hold over him - Barcelona’s front three had put together a move of elusively good cohesion.
It was higher-level integration… yet every individual part of the move was so easy and simple, with the minimalist nature of Messi’s touch the most obvious example. That illustrates their excellence, but it is also some way fitting, because it reflected how easy it was to execute too.
This is the great frustration for Wenger. Barcelona didn’t even have to be as good as they usually are and didn’t really “earn” their goals. Arsenal gifted it to them, with Mathieu Flamini’s rash lunge for the penalty just 47 seconds after coming on the most severe example.
Wenger was asked whether they failed to carry out his instructions in terms of allowing counter-attacks. “They want to do it. It’s just the first pass isn’t right. The first position isn’t right. You lose the ball in a position and suddenly they take advantage of it.”
The other side to that is that the reasons for the defeat actually went beyond allowing such a counter, especially since Arsenal had generally got their tactics right and played quite well.
Applying the contain-and-counter game that worked against Bayern Munich, Wenger’s side had limited Barca as well as anyone can. The Catalans still created good chances, of course, but there are always going to be a few when you have a forward line of that quality. Arsenal did still manage to subdue them. Barcelona’s average shots on target per game this season has been 6.8. In this, it was just four - and two of them were Messi’s goals, with one a penalty.
Much of that looked down to the excellent Nacho Monreal, who was for a long time so impressively focused in regularly impeding the Argentine. He made three key interceptions - the third highest in the game. Laurent Koscielny had the most with six, and one of them left Messi on the ground.
It was a sign of Arsenal’s defensive resilience - but that brought us to the crunch.
Had Wenger come away with a 0-0 draw, it would have been a fine platform for the return game, especially since it would finally have avoided conceding the first-leg away goal that the manager had made such an issue of before the game. That was what cost them in the last three seasons.
What did you make of the first leg between Arsenal and Barcelona and is it game over for the Gunners? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below
bad bad Arsenal
Good, balanced article that I agree with.
Obviously Barcelona was the much better team in just about all aspects of the game. Especially ball control and touch in tide areas and under pressure was much better. So it is no surprise that the better team wins. If Arsenal loses against Barcelona it doesn't mean they did some great mistakes it just means they are simply not good enough a team to win against Barca. Happens...
@neumi17 In a first half both teams succeed in their game plans: Arsenal defended tight and caused Barca some troubles from counter attacks plus they should have scored once. Barcelona kept the ball and played carefully, creating couple of chances in the end. Second half Barca increased tempo and appeared as a better side. However, neither team could score until Barca's counter attacking goal. Second goal wasn't undeserved, but it was gift from Mertesacker and Flamini either way. So Barca was good, their players were brilliant but their both goals came from Arsenal's rather easy mistakes.
@Castle Yes true but goals always come after mistakes. And those mistakes happen because Arsenal had to give more than a 100 % for 60 minutes to keep up with Barca since they are not as good as them. When the exaustion kicks in mistakes happen. On the other hand Suarez alone could have made it 3-0. It is just a normal result between those two teams. There is no need to make an article about Arsenals mistakes since it was not a match on equal terms. If Arsenal wins against Stoke nobody is making a fuss about why Stoke lost ! They just did because the other team is better, period ...
@neumi17 Yes, but on any given day one team can match or better a superior team in how they play. And the 1st goal wasn't due to exhaustion, it was due to leaving ourselves exposed at the back when everyone went forward.